World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations

The World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations is a working party (WP.29) [1] of the Sustainable Transport Division of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). It is tasked with creating a uniform system of regulations, called UN Regulations, for vehicle design to facilitate international trade.

WP.29 was established in June one thousand nine hundred fifty two as the “Working Party of experts on technical requirement of vehicles”, while its current name was adopted in 2000.

Contents

The core of the Forum’s work is based around the “1958 Agreement”, formally titled “Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions” (E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.Two, amended on sixteen October 1995). This forms a legal framework wherein participating countries (contracting parties) agree on a common set of technical prescriptions and protocols for type approval of vehicles and components. These were formerly called “UNECE Regulations” or, less formally, “ECE Regulations” in reference to the Economic Commission for Europe. However, since many non-European countries are now contracting parties to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement, the regulations are officially entitled “UN Regulations”. [Two] [Three] Each contracting party’s type approvals are recognised by all other contracting parties.

Participating countries Edit

The very first signatories to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement include Italy (March 28), Netherlands (March 30), Germany (June Nineteen), France (June 26), Hungary (June 30), Sweden and Belgium. Originally, the agreement permitted participation of ECE member countries only, but in one thousand nine hundred ninety five the agreement was revised to permit non-ECE members to participate. Current participants include European Union and its member countries, as well non-EU UNECE members such as Norway, Russia, Ukraine, Croatia, Serbia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Azerbaijan and Tunisia, and even remote territories such as South Africa, Australia, Fresh Zealand, Japan, South Korea, Thailand and Malaysia.

As of two thousand sixteen [update] , the participants to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement, with their UN country code, were:. [Four]

Most countries, even if not formally participating in the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight agreement, recognise the UN Regulations and either mirror the UN Regulations’ content in their own national requirements, or permit the import, registration, and use of UN type-approved vehicles, or both. The United States and Canada are the two significant exceptions; the UN regulations are generally not recognised and UN-compliant vehicles and equipment are not authorised for import, sale, or use in the two regions, unless they are tested to be compliant with the region’s car safety laws, or for limited non driving use (e.g. car showcase displays). [Five]

Type approval Edit

The one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement operates on the principles of type approval and reciprocal recognition. Any country that accedes to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement has authority to test and approve any manufacturer’s design of a regulated product, regardless of the country in which that component was produced. Each individual design from each individual manufacturer is counted as one individual type. Once any acceding country grants a type approval, every other acceding country is obliged to honor that type approval and regard that vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment as legal for import, sale and use. Items type-approved according to a UN Regulation are marked with an E and a number, within a circle. The number indicates which country approved the item, and other surrounding letters and digits indicate the precise version of the regulation met and the type approval number, respectively.

Albeit all countries’ type approvals are legally equivalent, there are real and perceived differences in the rigour with which the regulations and protocols are applied by different national type approval authorities. Some countries have their own national standards for granting type approvals, which may be more stringent than called for by the UN regulations themselves. Within the auto parts industry, a German (E1) type approval, for example, is regarded as a measure of insurance against suspicion of poor quality or an undeserved type approval. [6]

UN Regulations Edit

As of two thousand fifteen [update] , there are one hundred thirty five UN Regulations appended to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement; most regulations cover a single vehicle component or technology. A partial list of current regulations applying to passenger cars goes after (different regulations may apply to strenuous vehicles, motorcycles, etc.)

General lighting Edit

  • R3 — Retroreflecting devices
  • R4 — Illumination of rear registration plates
  • R6 — Direction indicators
  • R7 — Front and rear position lamps, stop lamps and end-outline marker lamps
  • R19 — Front fog lamps
  • R23 — Reversing lights
  • R37 — Filament lamps (bulbs) (See: Automotive lamp types)
  • R38 — Rear fog lamps
  • R48 — Installation of lighting and light-signalling devices
  • R77 — Parking lamps
  • R87 — Daytime running lamps
  • R91 — Side marker lamps
  • R119 — Cornering lamps
  • R123 — AFS lamps
  • R128 — LED light sources

Headlamps Edit

  • R1 – Headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing rafter and/or a driving rafter, tooled with R2 or HS1 bulbs (superseded by R112, but still valid for existing approvals)
  • R5 – Sealed Slat headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing slat and/or a driving rafter
  • R8 – Headlamps tooled with replaceable single-filament tungsten-halogen bulbs (superseded by R112, but still valid for existing approvals)
  • R20 – Headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing rafter and/or a driving plank and tooled with halogen double-filament H4 bulbs (superseded by R112, but still valid for existing approvals)
  • R31 — Halogen sealed slat headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing plank and/or a driving plank
  • R45 — Headlamp cleaners
  • R98 — Headlamps tooled with gas-discharge light sources
  • R99 — Gas-discharge light sources for use in approved gas-discharge lamp units of power-driven vehicles (See: Automotive lamp types)
  • R112 — Headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing plank and/or a driving rafter and tooled with filament bulbs
  • R113 — Headlamps emitting a symmetrical passing slat and/or a driving slat and tooled with filament bulbs

Instrumentation/controls Edit

  • R35 — arrangement of foot controls
  • R39 — speedometer equipment
  • R46 — rear-view mirrors
  • R79 — steering equipment

Crashworthiness Edit

  • R11 — door latches and door retention components
  • R13-H — braking (passenger cars)
  • R13 — braking (trucks and busses)
  • R14 — safety belt anchorages
  • R16 — safety belts and restraint systems
  • R17 — seats, seat anchorages, head restraints
  • R27 — advance-warning triangles
  • R42 — front and rear protective devices (bumpers, etc.)
  • R43 — safety glazing materials and their installation on vehicles
  • R94 — protection of the occupants in the event of a frontal collision
  • R95 — protection of the occupants in the event of a lateral collision
  • R116 — protection of motor vehicles against unauthorized use
  • R129 — enhanced child restraint systems (ECRS)

Environmental compatibility Edit

  • R10 — electromagnetic compatibility
  • R15 — emissions and fuel consumption (superseded by R83, R84 and R101)
  • R24 — engine power measurement, smoke emissions, engine type approval
  • R51 — noise emissions
  • R68 — measurement of the maximum speed
  • R83 — emission of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements
  • R84 — measurement of fuel consumption
  • R85 — electrified drive trains — measurement of the net power and the maximum thirty minutes power of electrified drive trains
  • R100 — approval of battery electrified vehicles with regard to specific requeriments for the construction, Functional Safety and hydrogen emission. [7]
  • R101 — measurement of the emission of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption
  • R117 — rolling sound emissions of tyres

Tyres & wheels Edit

  • R30 — Tyres for passenger cars and their trailers
  • R54 — Tyres for commercial vehicles and their trailers
  • R64 — Improvised use spare unit, run vapid tyres, run flat-system and tyre pressure monitoring
  • R75 — Tyres for motorcycles/mopeds
  • R88 — Retroreflective tyres for two-wheeled vehicles
  • R106 — Tyres for agricultural vehicles
  • R108 — Retreaded tyres for passenger cars and their trailers
  • R109 — Retreaded tyres for commercial vehicles and their trailers
  • R124 — Replacement wheels for passenger cars

The most notable non-signatory to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement is the United States, which has its own Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and does not recognise UN type approvals. However, both the United States and Canada are parties to the one thousand nine hundred ninety eight Agreement. UN-specification vehicles and components which do not also serve with the US regulations therefore cannot be imported to the US without extensive modifications. Canada has its own Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, broadly similar to the US FMVSS, but Canada does also accept UN-compliant headlamps and bumpers. It should be noted, however, that the oncoming Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement inbetween Canada and the European Union (likely to be ratified in 2015) could see Canada recognise more UN Regulations as acceptable alternatives to the Canadian regulations. [8] Canada presently applies fourteen of the seventeen ECE main standards as allowable alternatives [ citation needed ] – the exceptions at this point relate to motorcycle controls and displays, motorcycle mirrors, and electronic stability control for passenger cars. [ citation needed ] These three remaining groups will be permitted in Canada by the time the ratification of the trade deal occurs. [ citation needed ]

Self-certification Edit

Rather than a UN-style system of type approvals, the US and Canadian auto safety regulations operate on the principle of self-certification, wherein the manufacturer or importer of a vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment certifies—i.e., asserts and promises—that the vehicle or equipment serves with all applicable federal or Canada Motor Vehicle Safety, bumper and antitheft standards. [9] No prior verification is required by a governmental agency or authorised testing entity before the vehicle or equipment can be imported, sold, or used. If reason develops to believe the certification was false or improper — i.e., that the vehicle or equipment does not in fact conform — then authorities may conduct tests and, if a noncompliance is found, order a recall and/or other corrective and/or punitive measures. Vehicle and equipment makers are permitted to appeal such penalties, but this is a difficult direction. [Ten] Non-compliances found that are arguably without effect to highway safety may be petitioned to skip recall (remedy and notification) requirements for vehicles already produced. [11]

Historically, one of the most conspicuous differences inbetween UN and US regulations was the design and spectacle of headlamps. The Citroën DS shown here illustrates the large differences in headlamps during the 1940-1983 era when US regulations required sealed plank headlamps. [12] [13] It is not presently possible to produce a single car design that fully meets both UN and US requirements at the same time, [14] but it is growing lighter as technology and both sets of regulations evolve. Given the size of the US vehicle market, and differing marketing strategies in North America vs. the rest of the world, many manufacturers produce vehicles in three versions: North American, rest-of-world right-hand drive (RHD) and rest-of-world left-hand-drive (LHD). [14]

The “Agreement concerning the Establishing of Global Technical Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be fitted and/or be used on Wheeled Vehicles”, or one thousand nine hundred ninety eight Agreement, is a subsequent agreement. Following its mission to harmonize vehicle regulations, the UNECE solved the main issues (Administrative Provisions for Type approval opposed to self-certification and mutual recognition of Type Approvals) preventing non-signatory Countries to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement to fully participate to its activities.

The one thousand nine hundred ninety eight Agreement is born to produce meta regulations called Global Technical Regulations without administrative procedures for type approval and so, without the principle of mutual recognition of Type Approvals. The one thousand nine hundred ninety eight Agreement stipulates that Contracting Parties will establish, by consensus vote, United Nations Global Technical Regulations (UN GTRs) in a UN Global Registry. The UN GTRs contain globally harmonized spectacle requirements and test procedures. Each UN GTR contains extensive notes on its development. The text includes a record of the technical rationale, the research sources used, cost and benefit considerations, and references to data consulted. The Contracting Parties use their nationally established rulemaking processes when transposing UN GTRs into their national legislation. The one thousand nine hundred ninety eight Agreement presently has thirty three Contracting Parties and fourteen UN GTRs that have been established into the UN Global Registry. [15]

As part of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations, the issues of divergent standards in automobile regulatory structure are being investigated. TTIP negotiators are seeking to identify ways to narrow the regulatory differences, potentially reducing costs and spurring extra trade in vehicles. [9]

Organisation Internationale des Constructeurs d’Automobiles (OICA) hosts on its web site the working documents from various United Nations pro groups including World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations. [16]

World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations

World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations

The World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations is a working party (WP.29) [1] of the Sustainable Transport Division of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). It is tasked with creating a uniform system of regulations, called UN Regulations, for vehicle design to facilitate international trade.

WP.29 was established in June one thousand nine hundred fifty two as the “Working Party of experts on technical requirement of vehicles”, while its current name was adopted in 2000.

Contents

The core of the Forum’s work is based around the “1958 Agreement”, formally titled “Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions” (E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.Two, amended on sixteen October 1995). This forms a legal framework wherein participating countries (contracting parties) agree on a common set of technical prescriptions and protocols for type approval of vehicles and components. These were formerly called “UNECE Regulations” or, less formally, “ECE Regulations” in reference to the Economic Commission for Europe. However, since many non-European countries are now contracting parties to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement, the regulations are officially entitled “UN Regulations”. [Two] [Trio] Each contracting party’s type approvals are recognised by all other contracting parties.

Participating countries Edit

The very first signatories to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement include Italy (March 28), Netherlands (March 30), Germany (June Nineteen), France (June 26), Hungary (June 30), Sweden and Belgium. Originally, the agreement permitted participation of ECE member countries only, but in one thousand nine hundred ninety five the agreement was revised to permit non-ECE members to participate. Current participants include European Union and its member countries, as well non-EU UNECE members such as Norway, Russia, Ukraine, Croatia, Serbia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Azerbaijan and Tunisia, and even remote territories such as South Africa, Australia, Fresh Zealand, Japan, South Korea, Thailand and Malaysia.

As of two thousand sixteen [update] , the participants to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement, with their UN country code, were:. [Four]

Most countries, even if not formally participating in the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight agreement, recognise the UN Regulations and either mirror the UN Regulations’ content in their own national requirements, or permit the import, registration, and use of UN type-approved vehicles, or both. The United States and Canada are the two significant exceptions; the UN regulations are generally not recognised and UN-compliant vehicles and equipment are not authorised for import, sale, or use in the two regions, unless they are tested to be compliant with the region’s car safety laws, or for limited non driving use (e.g. car display displays). [Five]

Type approval Edit

The one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement operates on the principles of type approval and reciprocal recognition. Any country that accedes to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement has authority to test and approve any manufacturer’s design of a regulated product, regardless of the country in which that component was produced. Each individual design from each individual manufacturer is counted as one individual type. Once any acceding country grants a type approval, every other acceding country is obliged to honor that type approval and regard that vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment as legal for import, sale and use. Items type-approved according to a UN Regulation are marked with an E and a number, within a circle. The number indicates which country approved the item, and other surrounding letters and digits indicate the precise version of the regulation met and the type approval number, respectively.

Albeit all countries’ type approvals are legally equivalent, there are real and perceived differences in the rigour with which the regulations and protocols are applied by different national type approval authorities. Some countries have their own national standards for granting type approvals, which may be more stringent than called for by the UN regulations themselves. Within the auto parts industry, a German (E1) type approval, for example, is regarded as a measure of insurance against suspicion of poor quality or an undeserved type approval. [6]

UN Regulations Edit

As of two thousand fifteen [update] , there are one hundred thirty five UN Regulations appended to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement; most regulations cover a single vehicle component or technology. A partial list of current regulations applying to passenger cars goes after (different regulations may apply to strong vehicles, motorcycles, etc.)

General lighting Edit

  • R3 — Retroreflecting devices
  • R4 — Illumination of rear registration plates
  • R6 — Direction indicators
  • R7 — Front and rear position lamps, stop lamps and end-outline marker lamps
  • R19 — Front fog lamps
  • R23 — Reversing lights
  • R37 — Filament lamps (bulbs) (See: Automotive lamp types)
  • R38 — Rear fog lamps
  • R48 — Installation of lighting and light-signalling devices
  • R77 — Parking lamps
  • R87 — Daytime running lamps
  • R91 — Side marker lamps
  • R119 — Cornering lamps
  • R123 — AFS lamps
  • R128 — LED light sources

Headlamps Edit

  • R1 – Headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing slat and/or a driving plank, tooled with R2 or HS1 bulbs (superseded by R112, but still valid for existing approvals)
  • R5 – Sealed Slat headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing slat and/or a driving rafter
  • R8 – Headlamps tooled with replaceable single-filament tungsten-halogen bulbs (superseded by R112, but still valid for existing approvals)
  • R20 – Headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing plank and/or a driving rafter and tooled with halogen double-filament H4 bulbs (superseded by R112, but still valid for existing approvals)
  • R31 — Halogen sealed rafter headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing slat and/or a driving plank
  • R45 — Headlamp cleaners
  • R98 — Headlamps tooled with gas-discharge light sources
  • R99 — Gas-discharge light sources for use in approved gas-discharge lamp units of power-driven vehicles (See: Automotive lamp types)
  • R112 — Headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing plank and/or a driving plank and tooled with filament bulbs
  • R113 — Headlamps emitting a symmetrical passing rafter and/or a driving slat and tooled with filament bulbs

Instrumentation/controls Edit

  • R35 — arrangement of foot controls
  • R39 — speedometer equipment
  • R46 — rear-view mirrors
  • R79 — steering equipment

Crashworthiness Edit

  • R11 — door latches and door retention components
  • R13-H — braking (passenger cars)
  • R13 — braking (trucks and busses)
  • R14 — safety belt anchorages
  • R16 — safety belts and restraint systems
  • R17 — seats, seat anchorages, head restraints
  • R27 — advance-warning triangles
  • R42 — front and rear protective devices (bumpers, etc.)
  • R43 — safety glazing materials and their installation on vehicles
  • R94 — protection of the occupants in the event of a frontal collision
  • R95 — protection of the occupants in the event of a lateral collision
  • R116 — protection of motor vehicles against unauthorized use
  • R129 — enhanced child restraint systems (ECRS)

Environmental compatibility Edit

  • R10 — electromagnetic compatibility
  • R15 — emissions and fuel consumption (superseded by R83, R84 and R101)
  • R24 — engine power measurement, smoke emissions, engine type approval
  • R51 — noise emissions
  • R68 — measurement of the maximum speed
  • R83 — emission of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements
  • R84 — measurement of fuel consumption
  • R85 — electrified drive trains — measurement of the net power and the maximum thirty minutes power of electrified drive trains
  • R100 — approval of battery electrical vehicles with regard to specific requeriments for the construction, Functional Safety and hydrogen emission. [7]
  • R101 — measurement of the emission of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption
  • R117 — rolling sound emissions of tyres

Tyres & wheels Edit

  • R30 — Tyres for passenger cars and their trailers
  • R54 — Tyres for commercial vehicles and their trailers
  • R64 — Improvised use spare unit, run vapid tyres, run flat-system and tyre pressure monitoring
  • R75 — Tyres for motorcycles/mopeds
  • R88 — Retroreflective tyres for two-wheeled vehicles
  • R106 — Tyres for agricultural vehicles
  • R108 — Retreaded tyres for passenger cars and their trailers
  • R109 — Retreaded tyres for commercial vehicles and their trailers
  • R124 — Replacement wheels for passenger cars

The most notable non-signatory to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement is the United States, which has its own Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and does not recognise UN type approvals. However, both the United States and Canada are parties to the one thousand nine hundred ninety eight Agreement. UN-specification vehicles and components which do not also serve with the US regulations therefore cannot be imported to the US without extensive modifications. Canada has its own Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, broadly similar to the US FMVSS, but Canada does also accept UN-compliant headlamps and bumpers. It should be noted, however, that the oncoming Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement inbetween Canada and the European Union (likely to be ratified in 2015) could see Canada recognise more UN Regulations as acceptable alternatives to the Canadian regulations. [8] Canada presently applies fourteen of the seventeen ECE main standards as allowable alternatives [ citation needed ] – the exceptions at this point relate to motorcycle controls and displays, motorcycle mirrors, and electronic stability control for passenger cars. [ citation needed ] These three remaining groups will be permitted in Canada by the time the ratification of the trade deal occurs. [ citation needed ]

Self-certification Edit

Rather than a UN-style system of type approvals, the US and Canadian auto safety regulations operate on the principle of self-certification, wherein the manufacturer or importer of a vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment certifies—i.e., asserts and promises—that the vehicle or equipment serves with all applicable federal or Canada Motor Vehicle Safety, bumper and antitheft standards. [9] No prior verification is required by a governmental agency or authorised testing entity before the vehicle or equipment can be imported, sold, or used. If reason develops to believe the certification was false or improper — i.e., that the vehicle or equipment does not in fact obey — then authorities may conduct tests and, if a noncompliance is found, order a recall and/or other corrective and/or punitive measures. Vehicle and equipment makers are permitted to appeal such penalties, but this is a difficult direction. [Ten] Non-compliances found that are arguably without effect to highway safety may be petitioned to skip recall (remedy and notification) requirements for vehicles already produced. [11]

Historically, one of the most conspicuous differences inbetween UN and US regulations was the design and spectacle of headlamps. The Citroën DS shown here illustrates the large differences in headlamps during the 1940-1983 era when US regulations required sealed plank headlamps. [12] [13] It is not presently possible to produce a single car design that fully meets both UN and US requirements at the same time, [14] but it is growing lighter as technology and both sets of regulations evolve. Given the size of the US vehicle market, and differing marketing strategies in North America vs. the rest of the world, many manufacturers produce vehicles in three versions: North American, rest-of-world right-hand drive (RHD) and rest-of-world left-hand-drive (LHD). [14]

The “Agreement concerning the Establishing of Global Technical Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be fitted and/or be used on Wheeled Vehicles”, or one thousand nine hundred ninety eight Agreement, is a subsequent agreement. Following its mission to harmonize vehicle regulations, the UNECE solved the main issues (Administrative Provisions for Type approval opposed to self-certification and mutual recognition of Type Approvals) preventing non-signatory Countries to the one thousand nine hundred fifty eight Agreement to fully participate to its activities.

The one thousand nine hundred ninety eight Agreement is born to produce meta regulations called Global Technical Regulations without administrative procedures for type approval and so, without the principle of mutual recognition of Type Approvals. The one thousand nine hundred ninety eight Agreement stipulates that Contracting Parties will establish, by consensus vote, United Nations Global Technical Regulations (UN GTRs) in a UN Global Registry. The UN GTRs contain globally harmonized spectacle requirements and test procedures. Each UN GTR contains extensive notes on its development. The text includes a record of the technical rationale, the research sources used, cost and benefit considerations, and references to data consulted. The Contracting Parties use their nationally established rulemaking processes when transposing UN GTRs into their national legislation. The one thousand nine hundred ninety eight Agreement presently has thirty three Contracting Parties and fourteen UN GTRs that have been established into the UN Global Registry. [15]

As part of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations, the issues of divergent standards in automobile regulatory structure are being investigated. TTIP negotiators are seeking to identify ways to narrow the regulatory differences, potentially reducing costs and spurring extra trade in vehicles. [9]

Organisation Internationale des Constructeurs d’Automobiles (OICA) hosts on its web site the working documents from various United Nations experienced groups including World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations. [16]

Related movie:

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>